Wildlife, Best Management Practices
Home | Mission | Vegan News | News | The Issues | Links | Contact Us

News


Wildlife 

Wildlife Management and the Thin Blue Line

Beaver Problems in Medford

MSPCA high salaries questioned

Beaver dam flood woes hard to ignore

Farmers use guns to avoid E. Coli Outbreak

Fox Attacks Woman Returning Home From Walk

State verifies coyote killed is animal that tried to drag toddler.

Scotland Road resident warns pet owners Coyote attack


 

The Family

  • Families who hunt, fish and trap tend to express strong support for conservation programs and environmental protection.  
  • Harvesting wildlife contributes to a sense of self-reliance and independence.  
  • Trapping, and hunting in today's society has ofter been referred to as "recreational" in the context of a "sport," yet as the sociological studies have revealed, the term is a misnomer. It fails to consider the motives of the hundreds of trappers and hunters surveyed. 

The Book HSUS and PETA Don’t Want You to Read
 

Nathan Winograd is a Stanford Law School graduate and a former criminal prosecutor. He has also presided over America’s two most successful experiments in what’s become known as the “No-Kill” animal shelter movement. At SPCAs in San Francisco and Tompkins County, New York, Winograd showed that No-Kill animal sheltering -- the brand of hands-on animal care that deep-pocketed animal “rights” groups like PETA and the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) ironically oppose -- can work.

In his book Redemption, Winograd argues that the idea of pet overpopulation in America is a myth. PETA cites this “overpopulation” as the reason it kills nearly 90 percent of the dogs and cats it takes in. And the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) literally wrote the book on a system of animal sheltering that seems resigned to killing healthy pets out of sheer laziness, instead of looking for alternatives.

Redemption: The Myth of Pet Overpopulation and the No Kill Revolution in America is available online from Amazon.com and other retailers. Every copy sold is guaranteed to raise the blood pressure of the wrong-headed activists who run PETA and HSUS



Are children going to bed hungry and cold each night?


The clerk who files cancelled checks at the bank and has $2.02 in her account; the man who washes cars and does not own one, the woman who copy-edits medical textbooks and has not been to a dentist in a decade, their sons and daughters may be going to bed hungry and cold nightly. In addition, some of these children are malnourished. These are children of working poor families living in Massachusetts.


Before the urban and exurban dwellers thrusted themselves into the activities of the working poor, the working poor’s children ate high protein low fat meat.  They harvested rabbit, pheasant, deer, beaver and other wildlife. They fed their families from hunting, trapping and fishing along with shopping at food markets. The meat was very healthy and it filled the children’s empty bellies, especially, after a long day of school and play.


The working poor have self-respect. They are hard laboring people; yet, welfare programs are not available to them or acceptable to them. Beside feeding their families natural food from wildlife, working poor families used the small income they received from selling the fur of wildlife to purchase home heating oil, gasoline for their motor vehicle, and many other small necessities that any family needs.

In recent years, the Massachusetts Legislators have listen to non-profit organizations with million of dollars in their budgets to stomp on the working Poor’s family lifestyle. For instance, trapping was practiced for years by the working poor of Massachusetts. Until over a million dollars was spent in deceptive advertising by non-profit organization, such as the MSPCA and the Audubon Society, to stop trapping. Today, it is nearly impossible for any working poor family to trap wildlife to help feed and support their families.  
 

It’s difficult to ask legislators, whose children never retire for the night with an empty belly and whose children live in high income urban and exurban communities, such as, Boston, Brookline, Cambridge, and cities and towns east of route 495, to understand the needs of the working poor family. However, when the polite society, push a social cause that has a negative effect on lower levels of society, it smacks of social elitism.

Do We or Don't We